Use Arnold sheet 103 for the bounded chilling-dilution relationship, sheet 153 and Maloney sheet 77 for proof-and-form application, Arnold sheet 100 for the surface-water and holdback qualification, and Arnold sheet 132 for the finding that colder is not necessarily sensorially better. Cite Perrine’s shaking passage only when explaining the practical qualification.
For a traditional whiskey cocktail chilled with melting ice, water contribution and temperature should be managed together according to the whiskey's proof and the intended service form.
Perrine and Reigler's vigorous-shaking instruction is retained as the original apparent challenge. Arnold's bounded mechanism shows that the statement concerns technique and chilling performance rather than literal chilling without water addition.
Seven linked passages from four evidence paths were visually verified. Arnold's sheets 103 and 153 provide the missing technical boundary; Maloney supplies the direct whiskey application.
This applies to traditional cocktails chilled by melting ice under ordinary bar conditions. It does not prescribe a universal ratio, temperature, or mixing time and should not be generalized to externally chilled, pre-diluted, frozen, carbonated, or otherwise nontraditional drinks.
Maloney provides the whiskey-specific proof comparison; Perrine provides adjustment and shaking guidance; Arnold shows why ice-melt chilling and dilution are physically coupled under stated assumptions. Technique affects rate and texture, while proof and form define the suitable endpoint.
Status remains Ready for Drafting / Strong / High. The complete Liquid Intelligence review adds controlled surface-water and temperature examples while preserving the model’s stated thermal boundary.
Claim
For a traditional whiskey cocktail chilled with melting ice, water contribution and temperature should be managed together according to proof and intended service form.
Supporting evidence
Maloney gives a direct high-proof Old-Fashioned comparison and describes continued on-ice dilution. Perrine independently recommends adding water when a drink is too strong. Arnold establishes the bounded mechanism linking melting-ice chilling to dilution and explains how starting alcohol affects cocktail structure.
Reconciled challenge
Perrine's vigorous-shaking instruction is retained as the original challenge. It addresses technique, speed, and chilling performance; it does not demonstrate that melting ice can chill a drink without adding water.
Qualification
Do not convert the evidence into a universal ratio, temperature, or mixing time. The claim is bounded to traditional ice-chilled cocktails and should be presented as a method for selecting and tasting an endpoint.